9/10/2023 0 Comments Openwrt adguard home![]() ![]() Although the AdGuard Team does have big aspirations to continue making it do much more. 9-10 devices for a little bit over a week now and figured I would provide some feedback in case it may be beneficial to others here.ĪdGuardHome is, at the moment, is only a little bit more than just a DNS sinkhole system like many others at the moment. I have been running AdGuaradHome successfully on my network of approx. Likely due to odhcp already listening on port 67, but will dig in more when I have more time. I will try again tomorrow and see where I went wrong. I tried (and failed) today because I was curious about per-device AdGuardHome settings based on MAC addresses but it requires that you use the DHCP functionality. After you install it, you just have to change the luci-app-adguardhome to match the settings that you have for AdGuardHome (binary locations, work dir, port, etc.) and it will recognize everything from that point and you can make changes as Have you played around with the experimental DHCP functionality of AdGuardHome yet? The development appears to be in Chinese, however, the web UI itself shows in English on my device and works great for configuring many options for AdGuardHome. I found a nice, functional luci-app-adguardhome ( ). I've been thoroughly testing AdGuardHome since you created this fantastic HowTo post and I am glad that you posted this because I had been curious about AdGuardHome for a while. Thank you for your time, I do appreciate it. AdGuardHome everytime or is sudo just required for the initial launch? (I saw that command on it's wiki documentation site) Is it absolutely required to run AdGuardHome via sudo. Where is the best location within the file system to store the AdGuardHome binary so that it is appropriate for execution and for storing it's configuration file? (currently just executing from Tmp just during my testing phase before I decide to implement fully) Are you familiar with this error message?Īlso, just a couple of questions if you have a moment: I am not as familiar with Linux in general and therefore don't understand the error. Everything appears to be working great, although I do have one error message still showing up in the console still:Ĥ 16:02:24 command systemctl has failed: exec: "systemctl": executable file not found in $PATH code:-1 ![]() It is able to download filter lists and check for updates now. I have confirmed just now that this suggestion has fixed my problem regarding AdGuard Home network issues. sometimes AdGuardHome crashes if you do the upstream test more often.Īre ca-certificates or ca-bundle installed? some dns servers are sometimes down and somehow it is still a bit buggy. Those are really good regex rules which already block 50% of all ads/trackers/bots etc.ĪdGuardHome supports TLS DNS for more privacy. You may want to add those lists to your lists. Iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br-lan -p tcp -dport 53 -j DNAT -to 192.168.1.1:5353 Prevent DNS leaks and force all connected devices to use the new DNS port: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br-lan -p udp -dport 53 -j DNAT -to 192.168.1.1:5353 I have the Adguard Home DNS server running at 192.168.1.1:5353Īccordingly, the /etc/conf/dhcp config must be adjusted and the new DNS server must be defined: config dnsmasq So it will survive future OpenWRT updates !!!!Īfter AdguardHome is started on the router, open the browser and start the AdGuard Home web interface it is better to move AdGuardHome to a USB stick. Old binaries are moved as backup after an update. ![]() !!!! It is possible to install AdguardHome under /opt/, but this directory can grow. Nohup /mnt/usb/AdGuardHome/AdGuardHome > /dev/null 2>&1& Opkg update & opkg install coreutils-nohup It is also possible to run it in the background (manually started): AdguardHome and all necessary settings can be made via the web interface. The corresponding release must be downloaded and unpacked. Since it is programmed in Go, many architectures are already supported: Adguard Home can be started automatically via /etc/rc.local by simply executing the binary.DNS over TLS and HTTPS are supported by default.The DNS server can be operated in parallel to dnsmasq.Adguard Home comes with its own web interface, which can be accessed on a self-selected port.The big advantage over Pi-Hole is that Adguard Home does not need any dependencies and can be started from a single binary file.The DNS lists can be copied 1:1 from Pi-Hole or equivalent sources. I‘m running Adguard Home on a Netgear R7800.Īds/trackers/malware etc. To use Adguard Home on an OpenWrt router you need at least 20 MB free storage and about 100 MB free RAM (it can be started from a USB stick the more RAM, the better). This is a small guide for Adguard Home, an equivalent alternative to Pi-Hole. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |